WU Political Science Lowering the Drinking Age Essay
ANSWER
Title: Should the Drinking Age be Lowered from 21 to 18? An Examination of Pros and Cons
Abstract: This paper delves into the contentious debate surrounding the legal drinking age in the United States, specifically focusing on the question of whether the drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18. The paper explores the arguments for and against such a change, considering both the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with altering the current legal drinking age. Through a comprehensive analysis of various factors including public health, social behavior, and international comparisons, this paper aims to provide a balanced evaluation of the issue.
- Introduction: The legal drinking age in the United States has been set at 21 for several decades. However, there has been a growing movement advocating for a reduction in the drinking age to 18. Proponents of this change argue that 18-year-olds are legally recognized as adults and should be granted the responsibility to make decisions about alcohol consumption. This paper will explore the key arguments for and against lowering the drinking age.
- Arguments in Favor of Lowering the Drinking Age: a. Consistency in Adulthood: At 18, individuals are considered adults in terms of voting, serving in the military, and other legal responsibilities. Lowering the drinking age would align alcohol laws with the legal definition of adulthood.
b. Reduced Binge Drinking: In countries with lower drinking ages, such as many European nations, there is often a lower prevalence of binge drinking among young adults due to the gradual introduction of alcohol in a supervised setting.
c. Education and Moderation: Advocates posit that lowering the drinking age would allow for more structured educational programs regarding responsible alcohol consumption, reducing the allure of forbidden drinking and encouraging moderation.
- Arguments Against Lowering the Drinking Age: a. Public Health Concerns: Critics argue that lowering the drinking age could lead to increased rates of alcohol-related accidents, injuries, and fatalities among younger individuals who may not have developed the maturity to handle alcohol responsibly.
b. Brain Development: The brain continues to undergo critical development well into the early twenties. Lowering the drinking age could expose younger individuals to the potentially harmful effects of alcohol on still-developing brains.
c. Social Consequences: Concerns are raised about the potential for increased alcohol availability to impact school performance, increase crime rates, and contribute to social problems in the 18-20 age group.
- International Comparisons: The paper will examine drinking age policies in different countries, highlighting both positive and negative outcomes associated with varying legal drinking ages. This comparative analysis will provide insights into potential outcomes of a lower drinking age in the United States.
- Conclusion: In conclusion, the debate over whether to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18 is multifaceted and complex. Advocates of the change argue for consistency, reduced binge drinking, and education, while opponents emphasize public health concerns, brain development, and potential social consequences. It is essential to weigh these arguments carefully, considering both short-term and long-term implications for young adults and society as a whole. Ultimately, a well-informed decision should be based on a comprehensive understanding of the multifarious factors at play.
QUESTION
Description
TOPIC OF PAPER: “Should the drinking age be lowered from 21 to 18 ?yes or no ?why or why not ?”