UTA The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Essay
ANSWER
Title: Policy Analysis and Social Justice Implications in Substance Abuse Treatment: The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act
A. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA):
The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) is a federal law enacted in 2008 that aims to ensure that insurance coverage for mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is on par with coverage for medical and surgical services. The MHPAEA requires group health insurance plans with more than 50 employees to provide equitable coverage for mental health and SUD treatment services in terms of financial requirements and treatment limitations. This includes deductibles, copayments, and visit limits.
Relevance to the Client’s Presenting Issue: The MHPAEA is highly relevant to the client, Paul, who has a history of substance abuse and addiction. Substance use disorders are recognized as mental health conditions, and the act seeks to eliminate disparities in insurance coverage for these conditions. Paul’s ability to access and afford appropriate treatment services, such as rehabilitation programs, therapy, and medication, is directly impacted by the MHPAEA.
B. Evaluation of the MHPAEA Using the Karger and Stoesz Policy Analysis Model:
The Karger and Stoesz Policy Analysis Model involves several steps, including problem identification, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation. Below is an evaluation of the MHPAEA using this model:
- Problem Identification: The MHPAEA addresses the problem of inequitable insurance coverage for mental health and SUD treatment, which has historically led to disparities in access to care and financial barriers for individuals like Paul.
- Policy Formulation: The MHPAEA was formulated to require parity between mental health/SUD treatment coverage and medical/surgical coverage in employer-sponsored group health insurance plans.
- Policy Implementation: The MHPAEA has been implemented nationally, mandating that insurance plans comply with its requirements.
- Policy Evaluation: The effectiveness of the MHPAEA in achieving its intended goals has been positive to some extent. It has expanded access to mental health and SUD treatment for many individuals. However, challenges remain, including limited enforcement, gaps in coverage, and variations in state-level implementation.
C. Recommendations for Policy Review and Application:
- Evaluate Effectiveness: Continued research should assess the effectiveness of the MHPAEA in reducing disparities in access to mental health and SUD treatment. Identify areas where compliance is lacking and address these issues through enforcement mechanisms.
- Identify Gaps and Limitations: Research should focus on identifying specific gaps and limitations in the current policy, such as variations in state implementation and the need for clearer guidelines.
- Evolving Landscape: Consider the changing landscape of mental health and addiction treatment, including the integration of telehealth services, and ensure the MHPAEA remains adaptable to new treatment modalities.
- Barriers to Effective Application: Address barriers to effective application, including provider shortages and inadequate reimbursement rates, to ensure that individuals like Paul can access timely and quality care.
- Emerging Substance Use Disorders: As new substances and trends in substance use emerge, revise the policy to include comprehensive coverage for emerging SUDs.
D. Social Justice Implications and Advocacy Plan:
- Historical Disparities: Acknowledge and address historical disparities and stigma associated with mental health and substance misuse issues through public awareness campaigns and education programs.
- Inadequate Access: Advocate for equitable access to mental health and SUD treatment services, especially in underserved communities, to address social justice implications.
- Individual Client Needs: Assist clients like Paul in self-advocacy by helping them navigate insurance claims, appeals, and external support resources.
- Collaborate with Organizations: Collaborate with organizations working in mental health and SUD treatment to enhance awareness and accessibility of services.
- Advocate for Policy Reforms: Advocate for ongoing policy reforms and revisions to strengthen the MHPAEA, ensuring its effective implementation and adaptability to evolving needs.
In conclusion, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act plays a crucial role in addressing disparities in mental health and substance use disorder treatment. However, ongoing evaluation and advocacy are necessary to ensure that the policy is effective, adaptable, and aligned with the principles of social justice. Clients like Paul can benefit from both policy improvements and individual advocacy efforts to access the care they need.
QUESTION
Description
Client’s presenting issue:
This paper correlates with a client that has been abusing substances from an early age, due to seeing his parents doing it and later developing the same habits. He abuses alcohol, have used heroine before, marijuana and others. He is a 22 year old Hispanic male, by the name of Paul. His brother tried to help him but he relapse and turn to the streets being homeless. He has been in and out of rehab but does follow through to prevent relapse or be sober. (To answer any of the questions, you can add on to his story to make it fit in with the paper)
Write a paper on the policy provided, and answering each questions.
A. Identify, explain, and apply (show how it is relevant) a social policy (not agency policy) relevant to the practice situation (e.g., client’s presenting issue, regulations guiding agency operation).
– Policy identified is The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act
(MHPAEA): What does this act covers and its relevance? What are the regulations?
– Discuss how it relates to the client’s presenting issues.
B. Evaluate the selected policy using a policy analysis model; be sure to identify the model, utilize the steps, and cite the model.
– Karger and Stoesz Policy Analysis Model
C. Provide recommendations for policy review, application, formulation, and/or revision citing relevant literature.
– Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy in achieving its intended goals.
– Identify any gaps, limitations, or challenges in the current policy based on
relevant literature and research studies.
– Consider the evolving landscape of mental health and addiction treatment.
– Identify barriers to effective application of the MHPAEA and propose strategies for improvement.
– Analyze emerging issues, such as access to telehealth services and emerging substance use disorders.
– Propose policy formulation or revision recommendations based on the identified gaps, challenges, and advancements.
D. Discuss social justice implications for the client situation based on the selected policy and provide and advocacy plan at the micro, mezzo, and macro level.
– Discuss the historical disparities and stigma associated with mental health and substances misuse issues.
– Analyze the social justice implications of inadequate access to mental health and addiction treatment.
– Identify the needs and challenges of the individual client.
– Assisting client in self-advocacy, including appealing denied claims or seeking external support if needed.
– Collaborating with these organizations to enhance awareness and accessibility of services for individuals with mental health and substance use issues.
– Advocate for policy reforms and revisions to strengthen the policy and ensure its effective implementation.
Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.
Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.
When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.
Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download. You can rate your writer or give your customer review.
