SOCW 5395 UTA Evaluation and Conclusion
ANSWER
Evaluation and Conclusion Paper
Introduction
This paper provides an evaluation of the intervention process involving the client, Paul Lockhart, and the agency, Central Texas Youth Services. The primary objective of this evaluation is to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, including the methods used for evaluation, the theoretical foundation of the intervention, policy implications, and areas for improvement. This paper will address these aspects in accordance with the APA 7 format.
A. Selection of Evaluation Method
The chosen method to evaluate change and improvement with Paul Lockhart is a survey. Surveys were selected for their structured format, which allows for the collection of quantitative data, facilitating statistical analysis and comparison. Furthermore, surveys enable the evaluation of multiple aspects of the client system’s functioning and progress simultaneously, making them a suitable choice for this evaluation.
B. Rationale for the Evaluation Method
Surveys were chosen for several reasons. Firstly, they provide a standardized format for data collection, ensuring consistency in responses. Secondly, surveys are efficient in gathering large amounts of data, which can be particularly useful when evaluating a client system with multiple dimensions of change. Lastly, surveys allow for quantitative analysis, which is essential for assessing the effectiveness of the intervention objectively.
C. Description of the Survey Method
The survey used in this evaluation is a structured questionnaire designed to assess various aspects of Paul Lockhart’s progress and functioning. The survey includes both closed-ended questions with predetermined response options and open-ended questions to capture qualitative insights. To facilitate data collection, clients were asked for their participation, with a clear explanation that participation was optional and not mandatory. This approach was chosen to ensure voluntary and honest responses from clients.
D. Evaluation of Intervention Effectiveness
To evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, research was conducted to review articles and studies related to the specific intervention used with Paul Lockhart. The outcomes of the intervention were assessed based on these research findings. Additionally, pre- and post-intervention data from the survey were analyzed to measure changes in various aspects of Paul Lockhart’s functioning and well-being.
E. Theoretical Foundation of the Intervention
The intervention used with Paul Lockhart was based on two prominent practice theories: Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT). SFBT is known for its strengths-based approach, focusing on solutions and clients’ strengths rather than problems. CBT, on the other hand, targets cognitive and behavioral patterns to bring about change. Research suggests that these two approaches can complement each other effectively. The integration of SFBT and CBT in the intervention aimed to provide a well-rounded approach to address Paul Lockhart’s needs.
F. Policy, Practice, and Research Implications
The evaluation has several implications for policy, practice, and research within Central Texas Youth Services. It is important to review the agency’s standard operating procedures handbook to ensure that the policies align with the findings of this evaluation. Additionally, communication with the Field Instructor can provide further insights into policy adjustments and potential changes in the intervention approach. Future research should explore the effectiveness of integrated approaches like SFBT and CBT in similar client systems to build on the evidence base for such interventions.
G. Critique of the Intervention
a. What was done well in terms of the intervention?
One of the strengths of the intervention was the establishment of trust and cooperation with the client, Paul Lockhart. Building a strong therapeutic alliance is crucial for any intervention’s success, and in this case, it was achieved effectively. This trust and cooperation were essential for the progress made during the intervention.
b. What could have been done to improve the outcomes with the client?
While the intervention was generally effective, it could have been further enhanced by including specific activities as part of the intervention plan. These activities could have provided Paul Lockhart with practical tools and strategies to implement the changes discussed during therapy sessions, leading to more tangible and immediate results.
c. How was the intervention empowering?
The intervention was empowering in several ways. Firstly, it provided Paul Lockhart with a platform for open communication and feedback. This allowed him to express himself and actively participate in the intervention process. Additionally, the determination demonstrated by Paul to initiate change in his behavior was a testament to the empowerment fostered by the intervention.
d. How may it have been discriminatory or oppressive?
Challenges with communication during the intervention may have inadvertently led to misunderstandings or misconceptions of information. It is important to acknowledge that any barriers to effective communication can potentially be discriminatory or oppressive, as they hinder the client’s ability to fully engage in the intervention process. Efforts should be made to address and overcome such communication challenges in future interventions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the evaluation of the intervention involving Paul Lockhart and Central Texas Youth Services provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of the approach used. Surveys served as a suitable evaluation method, and the integration of SFBT and CBT was theoretically sound. The findings have policy, practice, and research implications that can guide future interventions and improvements within the agency. While the intervention demonstrated strengths in building trust and empowerment, there is room for enhancement in terms of incorporating practical activities and addressing communication challenges to avoid potential discriminatory or oppressive effects. Overall, this evaluation serves as a foundation for continuous improvement in client services at Central Texas Youth Services.
References
[Include relevant references here, in APA 7 format.]
QUESTION
Description
Write a paper answering all the questions below thoroughly. This paper is based on the client Paul Lockhart and the agency (Central Texas Youth Services) that helped him. This paper should have an introduction, body, and references used. The paper should be written in APA 7 format. Feel free to add any additional information, and I also provided a guide to help with the questions.
Part 5: Evaluation and Conclusion Paper
A. Select one of the methods used to evaluate change and improvement with clients/client
systems (e.g., single subject, pretest/posttest, or other).
– Survey
B. Provide a rational for the evaluation method selected.
– Surveys provide a structured format for collecting quantitative data, allowing
for statistical analysis and comparison.
– Multiple aspects of the client system’s functioning and progress can be evaluated
simultaneously.
C. Describe the method and how you would (or did)facilitate using that method to collect data to assess change and improvement.
– What type of survey it is
– I would ask clients for their participation and state that it is optional and not
mandatory.
D. Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention utilizing appropriate research methods for
selected intervention.
– Research the intervention and review articles about it being used.
– What were the outcomes?
E. Provide a discussion of whether the intervention was developed from a theoretical
practice model. If so, which practice theory? If not, what practice theory could have been
used to facilitate better outcomes? Regardless, analyze and provide evidence-based
knowledge about the theory-based knowledge about the theory-based intervention (used
or proposed) and its effectiveness.
– SFBT and CBT
– Research on how they work well together and their effectiveness.
F. Discuss the policy, practice and research implications of your evaluation and next steps
for the client/agency. (Central Texas Youth Services)
– Review agency’s standard of procedures handbook for policies they have and
make reference.
– Speak with Field Instructor for additional information and ask any questions.
G. Write a critique of your work with the client.
a. What did you do well in terms of the intervention?
– Gained client’s trust and cooperation.
b. What could have been done to improve the outcomes with the client?
– Include some activities as part of the intervention
c. How was the intervention empowering?
– Positive feedback and participation client
-The determination to want a change in behavior
d.How may it have been discriminatory or oppressive?
– Challenges with communication
– Misconception of information
Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.
Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.
When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.
Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download. You can rate your writer or give your customer review.
