Social Science The Criminal Justice System Discussion
ANSWER
To determine whether Reisel’s argument is for or against the use of Restorative Justice practices, you should consider the key points and arguments he makes in the Ted Talk. Look for clues in his presentation regarding the effectiveness and appropriateness of Restorative Justice in addressing crime and conflict. Here’s a general framework to help you evaluate his stance:
- Benefits of Restorative Justice: Does Reisel highlight any potential benefits of Restorative Justice practices, such as reducing recidivism, promoting empathy, or fostering a sense of responsibility among offenders?
- Critiques and Concerns: Does Reisel express any concerns or criticisms about Restorative Justice, such as its limitations, potential for re-victimization, or challenges in implementation?
- Empirical Evidence: Does Reisel provide any empirical evidence or examples to support his argument? Are these examples in favor of Restorative Justice or against it?
- Alternative Approaches: Does Reisel suggest alternative approaches to addressing crime and conflict? If so, do these alternatives align more with traditional punitive methods or with the principles of Restorative Justice?
By analyzing Reisel’s presentation using these criteria, you should be able to determine whether he argues for or against the use of Restorative Justice practices. Keep in mind that speakers in Ted Talks often present complex arguments, so it’s essential to consider the nuances of their viewpoints and the evidence they provide to support their claims.
Question Description
I’m trying to learn for my Social Science class and I’m stuck. Can you help?
Watch the following Ted Talk available here: Link (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Based on Reisel’s argument would you argue for or against the use of Restorative Justice practices?https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_reisel_the_neuros…
![Place Your Order Here](http://scholarywriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Bottom-of-every-post.png)