Welcome to Assignments Writing

Your Trusted Partner in Term Paper Writing

At Assignments Writing, we’re a team of passionate educators and skilled writers committed to supporting students in their academic journey.

PSY 640 AU Psychology Neuropsychological Tests Discussion

PSY 640 AU Psychology Neuropsychological Tests Discussion

ANSWER

Forensic Scenario One: Mr. W (Legal Guardianship Over Elderly Parent)

Summary of Significant Test Data: In Mr. W’s case, the most significant test data would likely include assessments of decision-making capacity, cognitive functioning, and any signs of cognitive impairment that might affect his ability to care for his elderly parent.

Additional Assessment Instruments and Evaluation Procedures:

  1. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): This commonly used tool assesses cognitive impairment and provides an initial snapshot of cognitive functioning.
  2. Capacity Assessment Instruments: Utilize instruments like the Aid to Capacity Evaluation (ACE) or the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) to assess Mr. W’s decision-making capacity.
  3. Dementia Screening Tools: Administer instruments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) to detect any potential cognitive decline.

Ethical and Professional Practice Standards Evaluation: Ensure that all assessment instruments are administered by trained professionals, maintaining confidentiality and informed consent throughout the evaluation process. Adhere to ethical guidelines, such as those outlined by the American Psychological Association (APA), ensuring competence, objectivity, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest.

Reliability and Validity Analysis: Prioritize assessment tools with established reliability and validity. Look for instruments that have been extensively researched and validated in similar contexts to ensure accurate and consistent results.

Forensic Scenario Two: Mr. M (Not Guilty Plea)

Summary of Significant Test Data: The significant test data in Mr. M’s case would involve evaluations of his mental condition, including potential mental disorders or cognitive impairments that might impact his legal responsibility.

Additional Assessment Instruments and Evaluation Procedures:

  1. Structured Clinical Interviews: Conduct structured clinical interviews, such as the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5), to diagnose any potential mental disorders.
  2. Personality Assessment: Use the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) to assess personality traits and any potential psychopathology.
  3. Risk Assessment Tools: Administer risk assessment tools, like the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) or the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG), to assess the likelihood of future violent behavior.

Ethical and Professional Practice Standards Evaluation: Ensure that the assessment is conducted in a neutral and unbiased manner, adhering to guidelines set forth by professional organizations like the APA. Maintain client confidentiality and provide clear information about the purpose and potential outcomes of the evaluation.

Reliability and Validity Analysis: Choose assessment tools with established reliability and validity for the specific conditions being evaluated. Research their track record in forensic settings to ensure accurate and trustworthy results.

Forensic Scenario Three: Ms. X (Personal Injury Lawsuit)

Summary of Significant Test Data: For Ms. X’s case, the significant test data would revolve around her neuropsychological functioning and its impact on her claims in the personal injury lawsuit.

Additional Assessment Instruments and Evaluation Procedures:

  1. Neuropsychological Assessment Batteries: Utilize comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries like the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) to assess cognitive functioning.
  2. Functional Capacity Evaluations: Conduct assessments of Ms. X’s functional abilities using tools like the Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) to determine how her injuries impact her daily life and work abilities.
  3. Pain Assessment Instruments: Administer pain assessment tools such as the McGill Pain Questionnaire to evaluate the nature and intensity of any pain she may be experiencing.

Ethical and Professional Practice Standards Evaluation: Ensure that the assessment is conducted in an impartial and unbiased manner, with a focus on the specific legal questions at hand. Comply with ethical guidelines related to informed consent, confidentiality, and maintaining objectivity.

Reliability and Validity Analysis: Opt for assessment instruments that have been extensively validated in forensic and medical settings to provide credible and dependable results.

Remember, in each scenario, it’s crucial to tailor the assessment instruments and procedures to the

specific details of the case and the individual being evaluated. Additionally, consulting with experts in the field, staying up-to-date with the latest research, and following ethical guidelines are all essential to conducting a thorough and valid forensic evaluation. Since I don’t have access to specific external documents or links, I’ve provided general guidance based on the information you’ve shared. If you have more specific questions or need further assistance, please feel free to ask.

PSY 640 AU Psychology Neuropsychological Tests Discussion

QUESTION

Description

Forensic Scenario One: Mr. W (Attempting to Obtain Legal Guardianship Over an Elderly Parent): Attorney Mr. X referred Mr. W for an evaluation of his decision-making capacity. Mr. W’s children do not agree with the findings from a prior evaluation and have requested a second opinion. Review the PSY640 Week Six Clinical Neuropsychological Report for Mr. W (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Forensic Scenario Two, Mr. M (Not Guilty Plea): Your client, Mr. M., was referred by the court for an evaluation of his mental condition after his attorney entered a plea of not guilty on his behalf. Review the Case Description: Mr. M—Forensic, Pre-trial Criminal Score Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Forensic Scenario Three, Ms. X (Personal Injury Lawsuit): Ms. X was referred for a forensic neuropsychological evaluation in connection with a personal injury lawsuit she had filed. Review the Case Description: Ms. X—Forensic, Neuropsychological Score Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Place Your Order Here

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: We only hire the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of master’s and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. We are known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: We have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Format & Features

Our Advantages

How It Works

1. Fill Order Form
2. Make payment
3. Writing process
4. Download paper

Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.

Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.

When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.

Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download.  You can rate your writer or give your customer review.

What Clients Said

{

I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround. I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.

5
Mercy M
{

I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround. I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.

5
Jane L
{

I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround. I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.

4.5
Rayan M

LET US DELIVER YOUR ACADEMIC PAPER ON TIME!

We are a freelance academic writing company geared towards provision of high quality academic papers to students worldwide.

Open chat
1
Scan the code
Hello
Can we help you?