Welcome to Assignments Writing

Your Trusted Partner in Term Paper Writing

At Assignments Writing, we’re a team of passionate educators and skilled writers committed to supporting students in their academic journey.

PSY 640 AU Psychology Neuropsychological Tests Discussion

PSY 640 AU Psychology Neuropsychological Tests Discussion

ANSWER

Forensic Scenario One: Mr. W (Attempting to Obtain Legal Guardianship Over an Elderly Parent)

The most significant test data in Mr. W’s case is his performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), which yielded a score of 22. This score suggests potential cognitive impairment. To further assess Mr. W’s decision-making capacity, additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures should be considered:

  1. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): The MoCA is a widely used cognitive screening tool that provides a more comprehensive assessment of various cognitive domains compared to the MMSE. It can help identify specific areas of cognitive impairment.
  2. Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI): This instrument is designed to assess an individual’s capacity to make medical treatment decisions. Given that Mr. W’s situation involves legal guardianship, evaluating his capacity to consent to medical treatment decisions is relevant.
  3. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID): It is important to assess whether any psychiatric disorders are contributing to Mr. W’s decision-making capacity. The SCID can help identify any underlying mental health issues.
  4. Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE): To assess Mr. W’s ability to perform daily tasks and make informed decisions regarding his elderly parent’s care, a functional capacity evaluation can be conducted. This may include activities of daily living (ADL) assessments.

Ethical considerations:

  • Informed Consent: Ensure that Mr. W provides informed consent for all assessments.
  • Confidentiality: Maintain the confidentiality of Mr. W’s information and results.
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Consider cultural factors that may affect Mr. W’s decision-making and communication.

Professional practice standards:

  • Follow the guidelines set forth by the American Psychological Association (APA) and the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) for conducting forensic evaluations.
  • Utilize standardized and validated assessment tools to ensure the reliability and validity of the results.

Reliability and validity analysis:

  • The MoCA, CCTI, SCID, and FCE are well-established instruments with documented reliability and validity.
  • Ensure proper administration and scoring procedures to enhance the reliability of the assessment results.
  • Consider the potential limitations and biases associated with each instrument and address them in the evaluation process.

Forensic Scenario Two, Mr. M (Not Guilty Plea)

The most significant test data in Mr. M’s case is his performance on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), which yielded a score of 34, indicating a high level of psychopathy. To further assess Mr. M’s mental condition and potential mitigating factors, additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures should be considered:

  1. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): The MMPI-2 can provide insights into Mr. M’s personality structure, psychopathology, and potential mental health issues.
  2. Clinical Interviews and Observations: Conduct structured clinical interviews and observations to gather information on Mr. M’s current mental state, cognitive functioning, and any signs of psychopathology.
  3. Risk Assessment Tools: Utilize risk assessment tools to evaluate the potential for dangerousness and future criminal behavior, considering both clinical and actuarial risk factors.
  4. Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation: Assess Mr. M’s competency to stand trial to ensure he understands the legal proceedings and can assist in his defense.

Ethical considerations:

  • Informed Consent: Obtain informed consent for all assessments, considering Mr. M’s potentially impaired capacity.
  • Confidentiality: Safeguard Mr. M’s confidential information.
  • Duty to Report: If there are indications of harm to self or others, follow ethical guidelines regarding the duty to report.

Professional practice standards:

  • Adhere to the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct and the guidelines for forensic evaluations.
  • Use validated assessment instruments and follow standardized administration and scoring procedures.

Reliability and validity analysis:

  • The PCL-R and MMPI-2 are well-established instruments with documented reliability and validity.
  • Maintain objectivity and consider the potential for malingering or deception in psychopathy assessments.
  • Ensure that assessment results are interpreted within the context of Mr. M’s individual history and circumstances.

Forensic Scenario Three, Ms. X (Personal Injury Lawsuit)

The most significant test data in Ms. X’s case is her performance on the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV), which indicated significant memory impairments. To further assess her neuropsychological functioning and its relationship to her personal injury claims, additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures should be considered:

  1. Trail Making Test (TMT): The TMT assesses attention, visual-motor tracking, and cognitive flexibility, which can help evaluate Ms. X’s executive functioning and attentional deficits.
  2. Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT): The RCFT assesses visual memory and visuospatial construction abilities, providing additional information about Ms. X’s cognitive functioning.
  3. Validity Testing: Employ measures such as the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) or the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) to assess the validity of Ms. X’s reported symptoms and potential malingering.
  4. Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE): Assess Ms. X’s functional capacity and limitations related to her personal injury claims, including her ability to perform activities relevant to her lawsuit.

Ethical considerations:

  • Informed Consent: Obtain informed consent for all assessments, and clarify the purpose and potential implications of the evaluation.
  • Avoid Bias: Ensure that the assessment process remains unbiased and impartial to avoid any undue influence on the evaluation outcome.

Professional practice standards:

  • Follow the APA’s Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct for psychologists conducting forensic evaluations.
  • Utilize well-established and validated assessment tools to ensure reliability and validity.

Reliability and validity analysis:

  • The WMS-IV, TMT, and RCFT are widely used and have established reliability and validity.
  • Incorporate validity testing to assess the credibility of Ms. X’s reported symptoms and cognitive deficits.
  • Be cautious of potential biases that may affect the interpretation of test results, and consider alternative explanations for cognitive impairments.

PSY 640 AU Psychology Neuropsychological Tests Discussion

QUESTION

Description

 

 

Forensic Scenario One: Mr. W (Attempting to Obtain Legal Guardianship Over an Elderly Parent): Attorney Mr. X referred Mr. W for an evaluation of his decision-making capacity. Mr. W’s children do not agree with the findings from a prior evaluation and have requested a second opinion. Review the PSY640 Week Six Clinical Neuropsychological Report for Mr. W (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Forensic Scenario Two, Mr. M (Not Guilty Plea): Your client, Mr. M., was referred by the court for an evaluation of his mental condition after his attorney entered a plea of not guilty on his behalf. Review the Case Description: Mr. M—Forensic, Pre-trial Criminal Score Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Forensic Scenario Three, Ms. X (Personal Injury Lawsuit): Ms. X was referred for a forensic neuropsychological evaluation in connection with a personal injury lawsuit she had filed. Review the Case Description: Ms. X—Forensic, Neuropsychological Score Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Place Your Order Here

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: We only hire the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of master’s and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. We are known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: We have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Format & Features

Our Advantages

How It Works

1. Fill Order Form
2. Make payment
3. Writing process
4. Download paper

Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.

Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.

When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.

Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download.  You can rate your writer or give your customer review.

What Clients Said

{

I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround. I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.

5
Mercy M
{

I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround. I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.

5
Jane L
{

I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround. I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.I am very satisfied! thank you for the quick turnaround.

4.5
Rayan M

LET US DELIVER YOUR ACADEMIC PAPER ON TIME!

We are a freelance academic writing company geared towards provision of high quality academic papers to students worldwide.

Open chat
1
Scan the code
Hello
Can we help you?