PSY 640 AU Professional Approaches to Assessment in Psychology Discussion
Viewpoint 1: Traditional Intelligence Testing
The traditional viewpoint on intelligence testing focuses on measuring cognitive abilities using standardized tests, often derived from psychometric theories. These tests are designed to assess a wide range of cognitive functions, such as logical reasoning, memory, problem-solving, and linguistic abilities. The most well-known theory in this context is the “g factor” proposed by Charles Spearman, suggesting a general underlying intelligence that influences performance on diverse tasks.
Contemporary assessment measures related to this theory include the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). These tests have been widely used for decades and are continuously updated to ensure their reliability and validity.
Challenges arise in assessing individuals aged 26 to 60 due to the diverse life experiences and cultural backgrounds within this age group. Ethical considerations encompass the potential bias of traditional intelligence tests towards certain cultural and socioeconomic groups, leading to unfair disadvantage.
Evidence from validation studies supporting the use of traditional instruments suggests strong correlations with academic and professional success, providing predictive validity. However, opposing evidence highlights the cultural bias inherent in these tests, impacting their accuracy and fairness for individuals from different backgrounds.
When it comes to individual versus group assessment, individual assessment offers personalized insights but can be time-consuming and costly. Group assessment is more efficient but lacks the specificity that individual assessment provides.
Labelling individuals within this age group based on test results can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Mislabeling can result in missed opportunities or inappropriate interventions. Hence, there’s a need for cautious interpretation and consideration of multiple data points.
Viewpoint 2: Multiple Intelligences Theory
The multiple intelligences theory proposed by Howard Gardner challenges the notion of a single, general intelligence factor. Gardner proposed eight different types of intelligences, including linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic, and existential.
Contemporary assessment measures aligned with this theory attempt to measure these various intelligences through diverse methods. For example, linguistic intelligence might be assessed through writing tasks, while bodily-kinesthetic intelligence might be assessed through hands-on activities.
Challenges in assessing individuals aged 26 to 60 using this approach include the difficulty in designing assessments for all eight intelligences that are both reliable and valid. Ethical considerations encompass the potential oversimplification of complex human abilities into discrete categories.
Validation studies supporting this theory show that individuals can excel in different domains, and tapping into diverse intelligences can better capture a person’s strengths and potential. Opponents argue that the concept lacks empirical evidence and that it can be challenging to practically apply and measure these distinct intelligences.
Individual assessment based on multiple intelligences offers a more comprehensive understanding of a person’s abilities, while group assessment might overlook unique strengths. However, the absence of standardized measures makes it difficult to compare individuals.
Labelling in this context can be positive, as it acknowledges and celebrates various talents. Still, mislabeling can occur if assessments fail to accurately capture an individual’s true abilities, potentially leading to missed opportunities.
In conclusion, the debate on intelligence assessment for adults aged 26 to 60 involves contrasting traditional approaches focusing on general cognitive abilities with more contemporary theories recognizing diverse intelligences. Each approach has its merits and challenges, with ethical and sociocultural considerations playing a crucial role. The choice between individual and group assessment depends on the context and goals of assessment. Careful interpretation of results is essential to avoid mislabeling and ensure that individuals are given appropriate opportunities for growth and development.
QUESTION
Description
For your initial post, you will present at least two viewpoints debating professional approaches to assessment used in psychology for Adults ages 26 through 60. In addition to the required reading, research a minimum of one peer-reviewed article from the Ashford University Library on ability testing research at is pertains to your assigned age group.
In your initial post, you must
Briefly compare and discuss at least two theories of intelligence and the contemporary assessment measures related to those theories.
Analyze challenges related to assessing individuals in your assigned age group and describe any special ethical and sociocultural issues which must be considered.
- Analyze and provide evidence from validation studies supporting and opposing the use of specific instruments with your assigned population.
- Present the pros and cons of individual versus group assessment of ability.
- Summarize the implications of labelling and mislabeling individuals in your assigned age group as a result of testing and assessment.
Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.
Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.
When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.
Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download. You can rate your writer or give your customer review.
