Political Science Question
ANSWER
Debate Question: What is the most effective approach to reducing carbon emissions from transportation: promoting electric vehicles (EVs) or investing in public transportation?
Introduction: The debate over how best to reduce carbon emissions from transportation has given rise to two opposing approaches: promoting electric vehicles (EVs) and investing in public transportation. Each approach has its merits, and in this essay, we will explore the arguments for both sides and arrive at a conclusion based on the evaluation of logic and evidence.
Promoting Electric Vehicles (EVs):
- Reduced Tailpipe Emissions: Electric vehicles produce zero tailpipe emissions, addressing the immediate air quality concerns associated with traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. This could lead to significant improvements in urban air quality and public health.
- Consumer Adoption: The transition to EVs can be driven by consumer adoption due to their familiarity with conventional vehicles, similar driving experiences, and the convenience of home charging. Governments can provide incentives to accelerate this transition, such as tax credits, rebates, and charging infrastructure development.
- Technological Advancements: The promotion of EVs encourages ongoing technological advancements in battery efficiency, charging infrastructure, and renewable energy integration. These developments have the potential to enhance energy storage solutions beyond the transportation sector.
Supporting Evidence: A study by the International Council on Clean Transportation found that in regions with a high share of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, the carbon emissions associated with electric vehicles were significantly lower than those of traditional gasoline-powered vehicles.
Investing in Public Transportation:
- Massive Emission Reduction: A well-developed and efficient public transportation system can reduce carbon emissions by carrying multiple passengers in a single vehicle, reducing the number of individual vehicles on the road.
- Equitable Access: Public transportation serves a broader demographic, including those without access to private vehicles. By providing affordable and accessible transportation options, it contributes to social equity and reduces transportation-related emissions from lower-income households.
- Reduced Traffic Congestion: A robust public transportation network can alleviate traffic congestion, which in turn reduces idling and fuel consumption in congested urban areas.
Supporting Evidence: A report from the American Public Transportation Association states that using public transportation produces significantly fewer greenhouse gas emissions per passenger mile traveled compared to personal vehicles.
Conclusion: Upon evaluating the arguments for both sides, the most effective approach to reducing carbon emissions from transportation appears to be investing in public transportation. While promoting electric vehicles is a positive step toward reducing tailpipe emissions and advancing technology, investing in public transportation offers a more comprehensive solution by addressing emissions, equitable access, and traffic congestion simultaneously. A well-functioning public transportation system can lead to substantial emission reductions, while also offering social and urban planning benefits that contribute to a more sustainable future.
Most Important Reason for Judgment: The comprehensive impact of investing in public transportation on multiple fronts – emissions reduction, equitable access, and congestion alleviation – makes it a more holistic and impactful approach to addressing the challenges posed by transportation-related carbon emissions. By tackling these issues concurrently, public transportation offers a more sustainable and well-rounded solution for a carbon-neutral transportation future.
QUESTION
Description
Choose two opposing positions from the debate, present the best arguments for each side, then exercise your expert judgment to determine which side has the best argument.
When discussing the opposing arguments, you should maintain an objective tone and do your best to present the best case for both sides.
Your final judgment on the debate must be stated in the conclusion along with the most important reason(s) why you made that judgment.
Sources
Assigned readings should be read carefully and should be the primary basis for your arguments and must be included in your essay.
You must find 1 new source not included in the assigned reading. These should provide new content and should not be used instead of the assigned reading.
Carefully evaluate all sources for credibility; your conclusions are only as good as your sources.
Substance
Headings are required
Introduction and Conclusion required
Introduction must include a statement of your debate question (e.g., what is the most important climate change policy for the U.S. to implement? What should be the main focus in our efforts to reduce homelessness?) and the two answers to the question that you evaluate in the body of your paper.
The body of your paper explains the two answers to your research question using logic and evidence to support both answers. It is a good idea to address any possible weaknesses when making the case for a given policy position.
The Conclusion must include your final judgement on which answer is correct based on your evaluation of the logic and evidence and why that answer is correct. This is not the place to add new information but instead to analyze what is presented in the body of the essay.
Writing Advice
The sections that describe the two rival positions should each have 2-3 main arguments with supporting evidence. It is better to be focused on a couple core supporting arguments than to just throw out a bunch of information on the page.
Organization is important. Be methodical in how your essay proceeds, tell the reader what the main points are, tell the reader what you are trying to do, tell the reader where you are going and why.
Make sure to stay focused in your research and writing; keep asking yourself if you are making progress toward your goal.
Start with the most important part of the paper. Often when we start with a “background” section, we spend too much time on it and never get to the real question we were trying to answer.
Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.
Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.
When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.
Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download. You can rate your writer or give your customer review.
