New York Institute of Technology Manhattan Campus Marketing Question
ANSWER
Discussing the Findings and Conclusions:
- Summarize the Findings: Begin by summarizing the key findings presented in the article. What did the author(s) discover or observe regarding the impact of blockchain on financial services?
- Discuss the Methodology: Examine the research methodology used in the article. Did the authors conduct interviews, surveys, experiments, or a literature review? Assess the robustness and appropriateness of the chosen methods.
- Evaluate the Evidence: Assess the quality of evidence provided to support the findings. Were there concrete examples, data, or case studies that back up the conclusions? Consider whether the evidence is sufficient and reliable.
- Discuss the Conclusions: Examine the conclusions drawn by the author(s) based on the findings. Are these conclusions logically derived from the presented evidence? Are there alternative interpretations of the data?
Discussing the Author’s Point of View and Assumptions:
- Author’s Point of View: Identify the author’s point of view or perspective. Are they advocating for or against the use of blockchain in financial services? Consider the context in which the article was written.
- Assumptions: Identify any assumptions made by the author(s) throughout the article. These could be related to the technology, the financial industry, or other relevant factors. Assess whether these assumptions are explicitly stated and if they are reasonable.
- Unsubstantiated Assumptions: Determine if there are any assumptions that lack sufficient evidence or justification. Are there points in the article where the author(s) make claims without adequate support?
- Bias Assessment: Analyze the article for bias. Consider whether the author(s) have a vested interest in promoting a particular viewpoint or technology, and whether this potential bias affects the objectivity of the article.
- Consider Counterarguments: Evaluate whether the author(s) have considered counterarguments or alternative viewpoints. A balanced article should acknowledge opposing perspectives and address them reasonably.
- Contextual Factors: Reflect on the broader context in which the article was published. Were there any external factors, such as regulatory changes or technological developments, that could have influenced the author’s point of view or assumptions?
Remember to provide specific examples and quotes from the article to support your analysis of the findings, conclusions, author’s point of view, and assumptions. This will help ensure your assessment is well-founded and credible.
QUESTION
Description
Please find the link below for the peer-reviewed article “How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert Interviewees about pertaining to blockchain and finance”
link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520309926?via%3Dihub
Answer below sections
Discuss the findings and conclusion(s) drawn by the article’s author.
Discuss the author’s point of view and assumptions. Indicate whether unsubstantiated assumptions were made and whether there is bias that exists in the article.
Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.
Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.
When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.
Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download. You can rate your writer or give your customer review.
