Low-Priority Global Threats Analysis.
ANSWER
Opening Statement:
In prioritizing global environmental threats, we must revisit the potential challenges to our planet’s well-being. While the four threats highlighted in my previous presentation, namely Climate Change, Poor Health of Entire Populations, Inappropriate Uses of Technology, and Globalization, undoubtedly demand immediate attention, it is equally crucial to assess and justify why specific threats were not included as top priorities. In this document, I will examine two of the remaining threats from the list – Lack of Educational Opportunities and Cultural Taboos – and provide arguments for why they may be considered lower in priority compared to the previously mentioned ones.
Threat 1: Lack of Educational Opportunities
Reasons for Considering it Lower in Priority:
- Indirect Environmental Impact: While the Lack of Educational Opportunities is undoubtedly a significant global issue with profound social and economic implications, its direct impact on the environment is less pronounced than the four threats outlined in Assignment 3a. Climate Change, for instance, is an existential threat that directly contributes to environmental degradation through factors like greenhouse gas emissions and rising sea levels. In contrast, the Lack of Educational Opportunities contributes to poverty and inequality and does not have a direct and immediate environmental consequence.
- Source 1: UNESCO. (2021). “Education for Sustainable Development: Learning to Act, Learning to Achieve.” Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373091
- Longer-Term Focus: The prioritization of global environmental threats should consider the urgency of the issues. Climate Change, for instance, demands immediate action to mitigate its catastrophic effects. Poor Health of Entire Populations, linked to issues like pollution and the spread of diseases, also requires prompt attention. In contrast, addressing the Lack of Educational Opportunities involves long-term strategies for human development, which, while crucial, may not require immediate allocation of resources compared to the pressing issues highlighted.
- Source 2: United Nations. (2015). “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4
- Interconnectedness with Other Threats: It is essential to recognize that the Lack of Educational Opportunities is interconnected with several of the significant threats previously highlighted. For example, improving education can contribute to a better understanding and mitigation of Climate Change and Inappropriate Uses of Technology. Consequently, addressing these primary threats effectively could indirectly address the Lack of Educational Opportunities over time.
- Source 3: United Nations. (2020). “Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond.” Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf
Conclusion Statement for Lack of Educational Opportunities:
While the Lack of Educational Opportunities is undeniably an essential global concern with far-reaching social and economic implications, its comparatively indirect and longer-term impact on the environment, coupled with its interconnectedness with other primary threats, warrants consideration as a lower-priority issue in the context of immediate global environmental crises.
Threat 2: Cultural Taboos
Reasons for Considering it Lower in Priority:
- Varied and Contextual Nature: Cultural taboos are highly context-dependent and can differ significantly from one region or community to another. Consequently, addressing Cultural Taboos as a global environmental priority is challenging, requiring a nuanced understanding of specific cultural norms and practices. In contrast, the four threats previously emphasized are more universally applicable and quantifiable, making them more suitable for global prioritization.
- Source 1: Turner, B. S. (1997). “Medical Power and Social Knowledge.” Sage Publications.
- Complexity and Cultural Sensitivity: Addressing Cultural Taboos often involves navigating intricate cultural and ethical terrain, which may inadvertently lead to cultural insensitivity or imposition. It requires careful consideration and collaboration with local communities, which can be time-consuming and challenging to achieve globally. In contrast, addressing complex issues like Climate Change and the Poor Health of Entire Populations requires the same cultural negotiation and adaptation level.
- Source 2: Kleinman, A. (1978). “Concepts and a Model for the Comparison of Medical Systems as Cultural Systems.” Social Science & Medicine, 12(2A), 85-93.
- Resource Allocation: The allocation of limited global resources should prioritize threats with more immediate and widespread consequences. While Cultural Taboos can influence behavior and practices, they do not pose an imminent and direct threat to the environment on the same scale as Climate Change or Inappropriate Uses of Technology. Therefore, channeling resources toward addressing more pressing environmental issues is paramount.
- Source 3: World Economic Forum. (2020). “The Global Risks Report 2020.” Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020
Conclusion Statement for Cultural Taboos:
Cultural Taboos, though essential to respect and address within their respective cultural contexts, present challenges for global prioritization due to their contextual nature, complexity, and resource allocation considerations. In the context of immediate environmental threats, they may be considered lower in priority compared to the four threats previously emphasized.
QUESTION
Description
The information you provided in your presentation on Threats to the Global Environment has led to productive debates at the UN General Assembly! There are now questions about prioritizing the issues at hand. Some of the countries are challenging your recommendations and questioning your reasons for not including the issues they believe are priority.
From the initial eight global threats, there are four remaining threats that you did not choose in the list of major global issues. Review the list of topics and reflect on two that you did not use in last week’s assignment. Defend your reason for considering these topics lower in priority than the ones in your presentation.
Energy sources Civil war
Globalization Poor health of entire populations
Lack of educational opportunities Cultural taboos
Inappropriate uses of technology Climate change
The completed version of this assignment will consist of the following:
Select two threats from the list above that you did not use in your Assignment 3a presentation.
Create a minimum two-page document in which you outline a counterargument for the two threats you selected:
Write an opening statement describing the perception of each threat.
Write one paragraph for each threat in which you give three reasons to explain why the threat is less of a priority to the global environment than the four you selected in Assignment 3a. Support your reasons with at least three credible sources.
A conclusion statement for each threat.
Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.
Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.
When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.
Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download. You can rate your writer or give your customer review.
