FU The Varieties of Alien Experience Essay
ANSWER
Response Paper Outline
Title: (You can create a title that reflects the main theme or argument of the reading)
Introduction: (Approximately 1 paragraph)
- Provide a brief overview of the reading and its context (e.g., title, author, publication date, and any relevant background information).
- State the purpose of your response paper, which is to analyze the author’s main arguments and provide your personal critical response.
1. Overview of the Author’s Main Arguments (Approximately 3 pages)
a. Main Argument and Specific Examples: (Approximately 1 page)
- Summarize the author’s main argument or thesis. What is the central point the author is trying to make?
- Provide specific examples or evidence from the reading that the author uses to support their argument.
- Include relevant quotes or passages from the reading to illustrate key points.
b. Argument Presentation: (Approximately 1 page)
- Describe how the author presents their argument. What type of data, evidence, or methodology does the author use to make their case?
- Discuss the author’s writing style, tone, and any persuasive techniques used to convey their argument effectively.
c. Relationship to Other Authors: (Approximately 1 page)
- Analyze how the author’s argument relates to or interacts with arguments made by other authors in the same subject area or field.
- Discuss whether the author supports or refutes the arguments of others and how they do so.
2. Personal Critical Response (Approximately 2 pages)
a. Convincing Aspects: (Approximately 1 page)
- Discuss any aspects of the author’s argument that you find convincing or persuasive. What elements of the argument do you agree with, and why?
- Provide examples or evidence from your own perspective or experiences that support the author’s argument.
b. Problems and Oversights: (Approximately 1 page)
- Identify any issues, problems, or oversights you see in the author’s argument or methodology. Are there gaps in their reasoning or evidence?
- Constructively critique any weaknesses in the author’s approach or analysis.
c. Contribution to Broader Discussions: (Approximately 1/2 page)
- Explain what you believe this article contributes to broader discussions within the topic or field of study. Does it offer new insights, perspectives, or questions for further exploration?
- Discuss the relevance of the reading to current events or real-world applications, if applicable.
Conclusion: (Approximately 1/2 page)
- Sum up the key points of your response, emphasizing your main takeaways from the reading.
- Reiterate whether you found the argument convincing and why.
- Offer any final thoughts or reflections on the reading.
References: (If you cite any sources other than the reading itself, include a list of references in the appropriate citation style, such as APA or MLA.)
Remember to structure your response paper logically, provide clear explanations and evidence to support your points, and maintain a professional and academic tone throughout the paper. Additionally, be sure to adhere to any specific guidelines or requirements provided by your instructor or course syllabus.
QUESTION
Description
This paper should not merely be a summary of the reading itself. Rather, the paper will be graded based on the following inclusions:
1. An overview of the author’s main arguments (3 pages)
a. What overall argument is the author making? What specific examples does the author focus on in the reading?
PLEASE NOTE: Your group number is for grading purposes only. You must write and submit your own individual response paper. To find your group number, go to the course Canvas site, select “People” on the menu on the left side of your screen, then select the “Essay Groups” tab. If you do not see you name on any of the group lists, please inform me and/or the TA.
b. How is this argument being made? (e.g., What kind of data is being used by the author to support her argument?)
c. How does this argument support or refute arguments made by other authors in the section?
2. Your personal critical response to the reading (2 pages)
a. What, if anything, do you find convincing about the argument being made?
b. What problems and/or oversights do you see in the reading?
c. What, specifically, do you think this article contributes to broader discussions of the topic?