AU Sentencing Guidelines Tennessee First Degree Murder Essay
ANSWER
Title: Analysis of Sentencing Guidelines and Public Policies in TN State
Introduction: Sentencing guidelines are pivotal in ensuring consistency and fairness within the criminal justice system. This paper examines the sentencing guidelines for two specific crimes in the state of Tennessee, and the public policies that have shaped them. The chosen crimes for analysis are robbery and drug trafficking.
Crime 1: Robbery Sentencing Guidelines in TN State: In Tennessee, robbery is classified as a Class C felony. Sentencing guidelines for robbery are influenced by factors such as the defendant’s criminal history and the use of weapons during the crime. The range of sentencing may include imprisonment for 3 to 15 years, depending on these factors. Juvenile offenders convicted of robbery typically face lesser sentences, often involving rehabilitation-focused measures.
Comparison of Sentencing Guidelines: When comparing adult and juvenile sentencing guidelines for robbery, it’s evident that juveniles are generally given more lenient sentences, emphasizing rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Adult offenders tend to receive longer sentences, reflecting the seriousness of the crime.
Comparison with Other States and Federal Guidelines: Comparing Tennessee’s robbery sentencing guidelines to Texas and federal guidelines, there are variations in the specific sentencing ranges. These differences can be attributed to variations in state-level policies and priorities, as well as differences in crime rates and judicial philosophies.
Influencing Public Policies and Trends: Public policies that influence Tennessee’s robbery sentencing guidelines include the emphasis on public safety and rehabilitation. Trends in criminal justice reform have led to a focus on reducing recidivism and providing alternatives to incarceration for non-violent offenses.
Impetus and Data Supporting Policies: The impetus behind these policies is to strike a balance between punishment and rehabilitation, recognizing that lenient sentencing for juveniles can contribute to their rehabilitation and future reintegration into society. Data supporting these policies highlight the potential for successful reintegration and reduced recidivism rates among those who have undergone rehabilitation programs.
Proposed Change and Benefits: Proposing a change to the sentencing policies for robbery in Tennessee, a shift towards restorative justice practices can be beneficial. Implementing restorative justice programs that involve offenders, victims, and the community can lead to improved rehabilitation outcomes and victim satisfaction. Research indicates that such programs have the potential to reduce recidivism rates and promote community healing, fostering a safer environment.
Crime 2: Drug Trafficking Sentencing Guidelines in TN State: Drug trafficking in Tennessee is treated as a serious offense, with guidelines based on the type and quantity of drugs involved. Sentences can range from several years to life imprisonment, depending on the specifics of the case. Juvenile offenders involved in drug trafficking often face rehabilitation-oriented measures.
Comparison of Sentencing Guidelines: Comparing the sentencing guidelines for adult and juvenile drug traffickers reveals a similar pattern to that of robbery. Juveniles are typically subjected to less severe sentences, emphasizing rehabilitation and support for their future.
Comparison with Other States and Federal Guidelines: When comparing Tennessee’s drug trafficking sentencing guidelines to Texas and federal guidelines, variations again arise due to differences in state policies, crime rates, and legal philosophies.
Influencing Public Policies and Trends: Public policies that shape Tennessee’s drug trafficking sentencing guidelines are influenced by the War on Drugs era, where strict punitive measures were implemented. However, recent trends indicate a shift towards treating drug addiction as a public health issue rather than solely a criminal one.
Impetus and Data Supporting Policies: The impetus behind evolving drug trafficking policies is to address the underlying causes of drug-related offenses, such as addiction and socioeconomic factors. Data supporting these policies highlight the success of diversion programs and treatment options in reducing recidivism rates and addressing addiction.
Proposed Change and Benefits: Advocating for a change in Tennessee’s drug trafficking sentencing policies, a greater emphasis on diversion and treatment programs is recommended. Research shows that investing in addiction treatment and diversion programs can lead to reduced incarceration rates, lower societal costs, and improved public health outcomes, aligning with modern understanding of drug-related issues.
Conclusion: Sentencing guidelines in Tennessee are shaped by a combination of historical practices, evolving public policies, and trends in criminal justice reform. While the current guidelines reflect a balance between punishment and rehabilitation, there is potential for further improvement. Proposing changes rooted in restorative justice and treatment-oriented approaches can contribute to a more just and effective criminal justice system, ultimately benefiting both individuals and communities.
QUESTION
Description
Sentencing guidelines are determined through best practice research and public policies. Criminal justice practitioners must be well-informed regarding public policies and trends that impact sentencing in order to uphold best practices. In this summative assessment, you look at TN state’s sentencing guidelines for 2 crimes, as well as the public policies that influenced them.
Research examples of sentencing guidelines for 2 specific crimes in TN state and the public policies that influenced these guidelines.
Write an analysis of sentencing guidelines and the related public policies. Address the following in your paper:
Identify the 2 crimes you researched.
Describe the sentencing guidelines in TN state for each crime.
Compare the sentencing guidelines for adult offenders and juvenile offenders for each crime.
Compare the sentencing guidelines of TN state to the guidelines of TX state and the guidelines at the federal level for each crime.
Describe public policies and trends that influenced the sentencing guidelines in TN state for the crimes you researched.
Explain the impetus for the public policies and data that supported the public policies.
Propose a change to the sentencing policies in your state for the crimes researched and substantiate your proposal with support from research on the benefits of this change.
Fill in the order form and submit all your files, including instructions, rubrics, and other information given to you by your instructor.
Once you complete filling the forms, complete your payment. We will get the order and assign it to a writer.
When your order is completed, it’s assigned to an editor for approval. The editor approves the order.
Once approved, we will upload the order to your account for you to download. You can rate your writer or give your customer review.
