Ashford University Social Science Question bbv
ANSWER
Part 5: Analysis of Coherence Assessment Tool Findings
- Complete the Coherence Assessment Tool (Figure 6.2):
- Carefully fill out Fullan’s Coherence Assessment Tool, which assesses the four components and their related 13 subcomponents as outlined in Figure 6.2.
- Analysis of Findings:
- In your paper, provide a 2- to 3-page analysis of your findings based on the Coherence Assessment Tool.
- Summarize how you are addressing the four components and related subcomponents, giving an overall summary. Focus on key points, not every detail.
- Describe how coherence is perceived at all levels of your organization, highlighting one area where perceptions are similar and one area where perceptions are different.
- Explain at least two strengths and two areas that need improvement for moving toward continuous improvement and sustaining whole systems change.
Part 5: Reflection on Collaborative Process
- Positive and Negative Outcomes of Program Evaluation:
- In a separate 2- to 3-page section of your paper, identify at least two positive outcomes and two negative outcomes of program evaluation.
- Support these outcomes with evidence from research and your professional experience.
- Improving Positive Program Outcomes:
- Explain how, as a leader in special education, you plan to improve positive program outcomes based on program evaluation. Emphasize how this aligns with Walden’s Mission of creating positive social change.
- Key Elements for Accountability and Sustainability:
- Describe the key elements you believe will be necessary in the future to lead special education programs that are accountable and sustainable.
- Staying Current on Evidence-Based Practices:
- Discuss your strategy for staying current on evidence-based practices for program leadership, systems change, and program evaluation. Consider attending conferences, workshops, or engaging in ongoing professional development.
- APA Formatting:
- Ensure that you follow APA guidelines for formatting, citations, and references throughout your paper. Cite relevant scholarly resources used in your preparation.
- References:
- Provide a reference list for all resources used in your assignment, including the McIntosh et al. article and any other scholarly sources you’ve referenced.
In this assignment, it’s essential to demonstrate a deep understanding of program evaluation, coherence in your organization, and the ability to reflect on both positive and negative outcomes. Show how you plan to use this knowledge to improve your program and contribute to positive social change.
QUESTION
Description
CONTINUOUS PROGRAM EVALUATION
As with whole systems change and sustainability, continuous program evaluation is required to fulfill your commitment to improving the lives of all students. Although some of the evaluations you conduct may be informal, at the program level, the evaluation process is typically formal, can be quite complex, and must be formalized into a written plan. Data are gathered and collected from hundreds of students to compare their overall performance. Other factors include program costs, student and teacher input, and feasibility, just to name a few. Evaluations may also consist of comparing the effectiveness of two different instructional approaches. Here, data collection may consist of pre- and post-data from students and data collected from teachers to determine the effectiveness of each approach. Despite the type of evaluation, there is a formal written plan that is typically shared amongst stakeholders and used for curriculum planning and programming for students with exceptionalities.
For this Assignment, you will evaluate your program’s effectiveness using Fullan’s Coherence Assessment Tool and reflect on what you have learned from this collaborative process. This is Part 5 of your Course Project and will further demonstrate your effectiveness of implementing the Coherence Framework.
To Prepare:
·Review the Model of Sustainability in the McIntosh et al. article. Reflect on the four factors contributing to sustainability.
·Although it is not a requirement, you may wish to conduct a meeting with other leaders in the system and reflect on the components of the Coherence Framework to assist you in complete the tool. Use their responses and suggestions to assist in completing the assessment tool.
·Review and complete the Coherence Assessment Tool (Figure 6.2).
Part 5: Reflection, Social Change, and Lifelong Learning
Write a paper addressing the following:
·Complete the Coherence Assessment Tool (Figure 6.2) and include as an Appendix to your paper. Provide a 2- to 3-page analysis of your findings and the identified evidence that you reported on the tool, including the following:
oBriefly summarize how you are addressing the four components and the related 13 subcomponents. Please note: You do not need to address each component/subcomponent, just provide an overall summary.
oDescribe how coherence is perceived at all levels of your organization and identify one area where perceptions are similar and one area where perceptions are different.
oExplain at least two strengths as well as two areas you believe are of greatest need to move toward continuous improvement and sustain whole systems change.
·Include a 2- to 3-page reflection on what you learned from this collaborative process of program evaluation, including the following:
oIdentify at least two positive and two negative outcomes of program evaluation. Support these with evidence from research and professional experience.
oExplain how you, as a leader in special education, plan to improve positive program outcomes based on special education program evaluation and impact student learning. Include in your response how program evaluation can align with Walden’s Mission of creating positive social change.
oDescribe the key elements you will need in the future to lead special education programs that are accountable and sustainable.
oDescribe how you will stay current on evidence-based practices for program leadership, systems change, and program evaluation.
Support you Assignment with specific references to all relevant, scholarly resources used in its preparation following APA guidelines. You are to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the Resources for this course.
·McIntosh, K., MacKay, L. D., Hume, A. E., Doolittle, J., Vincent, C. G., Horner, R. H., & Ervin, R. A.(2011). Development and initial validation of a measure to assess factors related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavior support Links to an external site.. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(4), 208–218. doi:10.1177/1098300710385348
Coherence Assessment Tool Links to an external site.(Figure 6.2)