ARU Human Error Is a Result of Combination of Finite Intellect and Free Will Response
ANSWER
- Descartes’ View on Human Nature: You mention Descartes’ belief that humans are not God-like but exist somewhere between supreme beings and non-being. This reflects his perspective that humans are finite and imperfect beings created by God.
- Human Error and Its Causes: Descartes’ analysis of human error is touched upon, where he attributes it to the interplay between the faculties of knowledge and the freedom of will. Free will, according to Descartes, is a divine gift and not a source of error, whereas the finite nature of human intellect contributes to potential errors.
- God’s Role in Human Experience: You mention that God allows various experiences, including failure, misery, pain, and struggle, to help individuals grow stronger in their faith and move away from sin. This aligns with the idea that God’s role in human existence involves a purpose, even in adversity.
- Perception and Error: Descartes’ emphasis on clear and distinct perceptions as a means to avoid error is highlighted. The idea that once a perception is accepted, it prevents falling into error suggests the importance of rigorous examination and doubt in forming beliefs.
- Differing Opinions and Mistakes: Your disagreement with the notion that there are no clear truths and the assertion that people have different opinions and make mistakes is presented. This perspective suggests a more nuanced view of human knowledge and the limitations of reaching universal agreement.
It’s worth noting that Descartes’ philosophy is subject to various interpretations and has been debated extensively throughout history. Your response touches on some of the key ideas in Descartes’ work and presents your own perspective on these concepts. If you have any specific questions or if there’s a particular aspect of Descartes’ philosophy you’d like to explore further, please feel free to ask.
QUESTION
Description
respond Ceasar
Descartes brings out that since he was made by God, he isn’t God-like, but rather something between supreme beings and non-being. Human error doesn’t come from God: it’s a defect that comes from an imperfect being. Descartes would dig deeper to himself to determine the nature of human error and notice that it depends on two causes: the faculty of knowledge and the faculty of choice or freedom of will. Human error depends on the will and intellect and Descartes thinks that free will was a gift given from God and therefore perfect as it’s not an error source, but since the intellect is finite it’s not seen as the bigger image. Since man can’t understand what is beyond the scope of human intellect, our infinite free will doesn’t mean perfection.
With the sinful nature, God allows a lot of things to occur and once he allows us to experience failure, misery, pain and struggle, we can grow stronger faith with Him by having close relationships and moving away from sin. Random things happen for a reason as God made everything for its purpose. Human error results only when we form judgments about perceptions that aren’t clear, but once we accept a certain perception, we won’t ever fall into error.
Descartes suggests that we should adopt a method that will avoid error by tracing what we know to a firm foundation of indubitable beliefs. It’s possible that there are no clear truths and that’s why us humans test out what we think we know is truly correct. I would have to disagree because a lot of us have different opinions on certain aspects and most of the time, we can’t make agreements as doubt arises into place. Everybody makes mistakes and it’s a learning experience we go through all the time so anything can happen on a daily basis.
![Place Your Order Here](http://scholarywriters.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Bottom-of-every-post.png)