ANSWER

The 2020 Presidential Election in the United States was a highly contentious and polarizing event that gave rise to various interpretations and narratives. To understand the different versions of the election results, we can analyze them through the lens of social constructionism and apply sociological perspectives such as Structural-Functionalist, Conflict, and Symbolic Interactionist.

Understanding the Social Construction of Reality – Laying the Foundation: Basis of Reality: Social constructionism posits that reality is not an objective truth but is constructed by society through language, symbols, and shared beliefs. In the context of the 2020 Presidential Election, the basis of reality is shaped by individuals’ perceptions, beliefs, and the information they are exposed to. Different versions of the election results emerged because people were exposed to different sources of information, each with its own narrative and bias. For instance, some media outlets presented the election results as fair and accurate, while others promoted claims of voter fraud and irregularities. This divergence in information sources contributed to the construction of different versions of reality.

The Economics of Reality: The economics of reality refers to how economic interests and incentives can shape people’s perceptions of reality. In the 2020 Presidential Election, various economic interests were at play. For example, political parties, interest groups, and media organizations had financial stakes in how the election results were portrayed. Some media outlets may have been incentivized to sensationalize claims of election fraud to attract viewership and increase advertising revenue. Political actors may have used allegations of election irregularities to mobilize their base and raise campaign funds. Economic considerations can thus influence how different versions of reality are constructed and disseminated.

The Politics of Reality: The politics of reality examines how power dynamics and political interests can shape the construction of reality. In the case of the 2020 Presidential Election, the acceptance or denial of election results was highly politicized. The Conflict perspective can be applied here, as it emphasizes power struggles and social inequality. The Trump administration and some of its supporters challenged the election results, alleging widespread voter fraud, in an attempt to maintain political power. On the other hand, those who accepted the election results viewed this as an attempt to undermine the democratic process. This political conflict contributed to the existence of different versions of reality, with each side interpreting the election results to align with their interests and values.

The Medium is the Message: This concept, popularized by Marshall McLuhan, suggests that the medium through which information is transmitted can influence how that information is received and interpreted. In the 2020 Presidential Election, the medium played a crucial role. Social media platforms, for instance, facilitated the rapid spread of information and misinformation, often without rigorous fact-checking. This led to the proliferation of various narratives and conspiracy theories. The medium’s characteristics, such as the speed of information dissemination and the algorithmic amplification of certain content, influenced how different versions of reality were constructed and spread.

Sociological Perspectives on Social Order: Now, let’s apply the three sociological perspectives on social order to understand the political crisis surrounding the acceptance/denial-challenging of the 2020 Presidential Election Results:

1. Structural-Functionalist Perspective: This perspective focuses on how institutions and structures in society contribute to stability and order. In the context of the election, the structural-functionalist perspective would emphasize the importance of a functioning electoral system to maintain social order. The crisis emerged when some individuals challenged the legitimacy of the electoral process, potentially undermining social stability.
2. Conflict Perspective: The Conflict perspective views society as characterized by power struggles and social inequality. The election crisis can be understood through this lens as a conflict between different political and social groups vying for power. Those challenging the election results saw it as a way to address perceived injustices, while those accepting the results sought to maintain the existing social and political order.
3. Symbolic Interactionist Perspective: Symbolic interactionism focuses on how individuals construct meaning through interactions and symbols. In the context of the election, this perspective would examine how people’s interactions and interpretations of symbols (e.g., campaign slogans, protest signs) influenced their perceptions of the election results. It highlights the role of communication and discourse in shaping individual and collective understandings of reality.

In conclusion, the different versions of the 2020 Presidential Election results can be understood through the interplay of social constructionism and various sociological perspectives. Factors such as information sources, economic interests, power dynamics, the medium of communication, and sociological perspectives on social order all contributed to the construction of divergent versions of reality and the political crisis surrounding the election.

QUESTION

Description