Please be ON TIME OR BEFORE Just please make sure to stay in word limit!
ANSWER
Huffer et al. (2019) – “Bones of Contention: The Online Trade in Archaeological, Ethnographic, and Anatomical Human Remains on Social Media Platforms”
In their 2019 article, Huffer, Chappell, Charlton, and Spatola delve into the concerning issue of the online trade of archaeological, ethnographic, and anatomical human remains via social media platforms. They highlight how these platforms have become hotspots for the illicit exchange of such artifacts, posing ethical and legal challenges. The authors discuss the implications of this trade for cultural heritage preservation, ethical considerations, and the potential impact on academic research.
The study emphasizes the need for increased regulation and awareness surrounding this trade and suggests that social media companies should play a more active role in preventing these transactions. Additionally, the authors call for collaborative efforts between scholars, law enforcement, and social media platforms to curb this illegal trade.
Discussion Point: How can society strike a balance between preserving cultural heritage and preventing the illicit trade of human remains on social media platforms, and what role should various stakeholders play in achieving this balance?
Huffer et al. (2021) – “Osteological Assessment of a Seized Shipment of Modified Human Crania: Implications for Dayak Cultural Heritage Preservation and the Global Human Remains Trade”
In their 2021 article, Huffer, Guerreiro, and Graham present an osteological assessment of a confiscated shipment containing modified human crania, shedding light on the implications for Dayak cultural heritage preservation and the broader global trade in human remains. The study explores the significance of these crania within the context of Dayak culture, emphasizing their cultural and historical value.
The authors also discuss the challenges posed by the global trade in human remains, including the potential erosion of indigenous cultures and ethical dilemmas surrounding the collection and trade of such artifacts. The study highlights the importance of repatriating human remains to their places of origin and the need for comprehensive legal and ethical frameworks to govern this trade.
Discussion Point: How can societies and governments work together to protect the cultural heritage of indigenous communities like the Dayak people while addressing the complexities of the global human remains trade?
QUESTION
Description
Just please make sure to stay in word limit!
Huffer, D., CHappell, D., Charlton, N., & Spatola, B.F. (2019) Bones of contention: The online trade in archaeological, ethnographic and anatomical human remains on social media platforms. In: Hufnagel, S. & Chappell, D. (eds.) The Palgrave handbook on Art Crime (pp. 527-556). Palgrave Macmillan.
Huffer, D., Guerreiro, A., & Graham, S. (2021). Osteological assessment of a seized shipment of modified human crania: Implications for Dayak cultural heritage preservation and the global human remains trade. Journal of Borneo-Kalimantan, 7(1), 67–93.
Submit a summary each for Huffer et al. (2019) and Huffer et al. (2021). Each summary should start with the article title and end with at least one question or discussion point. These do not count toward the word limit. The main content of a summary should include the key points or arguments of the article (not simply a list of headings or sections). Construct your sentences carefully to make your summary informative and comprehensive. Use your own sentences and NEVER just tweak the publish abstracts. Each summary should be between 120 and 150 words (single spaced). Put both summaries on one Word document.